|
Post by Zone Fighter on Oct 20, 2007 10:30:24 GMT -8
Man Made Monster (1941)
Lionel Atwill - Dr. Paul Rigas Lon Chaney Jr. - Dan McCormick Anne Nagel - June Lawrence Frank Albertson - Mark Adams Samuel S. Hinds - Dr. John Lawrence William B. Davidson - Dist. Atty. Ralph Stanley Ben Taggart - Detective Sergeant Connie Bergen- Nurse Ivan Miller - Doctor Chester Gan - Wong (servant) George Meader - Dr. Bruno Frank O'Connor - Detective John Dilson - Medical Examiner Byron Foulger - Alienist #2 Russell Hicks - Warden Harris
Experimenting with electricity, a mad (literally) scientist (Lionel Atwill) turns a former carnival performer (Lon Chaney Jr) into a murderous monster. Sort of. Most of his killing is accidental.
Not a bad little (only an hour long) mad scientist movie. Like Larry Talbot, Dan McCormick is a symapthetic character. He didn't ask to be turned into an electric killer. The Wolfman came out after this film. Lionel Atwill is a great evil genius.
Included in "Universal Horror Classic Movie Archive".
|
|
Hakaida
Jungle Patrol
too sexy
Posts: 48
|
Post by Hakaida on Nov 17, 2007 7:58:02 GMT -8
I remember seeing this as a young boy one rainy Saturday afternoon during our local horror show "Sir Graves Ghastly Presents." I actually cried during the final scene. I wondered if it would have the same impact some 30+ years later. Yup. Lon is great here as 'Dan McCormick' and he elicits tremendous audience sympathy as we see he is an unassuming, charming, genuinely nice man, being being totally corrupted by a twisted deviant - all in the cause of science, of course! The other actors are very good here also. I don't think it would've impacted me anywhere near as much if it weren't for the inclusion of the little dog into the story. That's what tugged at my heartstrings then, and again the other day as I watched it for the first time in so many years. It was a brilliant plot device, because we all know that animals can easily sense a person's true nature so much better than other people. The little dog's trust and affection of 'Dan' makes us take him to heart, too. This makes his tragic demise so much more powerful. Or am I getting too sappy about a 59 min. formula film that hardly anyone else seems to extole the virtues of? Guess I'm just a wuss.
|
|
|
Post by Lunkhead on Nov 17, 2007 9:09:16 GMT -8
I certainly agree with you, Hakaida. The little dog angle brings a tear to my eye too. I think this is a fine, short film with Chaney and Atwill in top form. Until I bought the DVD set, I'd only seen it once before back in the '60s when I was 9 or 10, so finally watching it again after all these years was an experience for me as well.
|
|